The governments of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger have jointly submitted a bid to host the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) in 2032. Framed as a symbol of solidarity within the Alliance of Sahel States (AES), the proposal is intended to send a message of confidence to the African continent. However, beneath the ambition lies a pressing concern: do these three nations currently possess the essential conditions of security and stability required to host Africa’s premier football tournament?
Beyond stadiums: the security imperative
Hosting the AFCON is not merely about constructing or renovating stadiums. It demands an environment capable of ensuring the safety of athletes, officials, media personnel, supporters, and the hundreds of thousands of visitors expected to attend over several weeks. It is on this critical requirement that the joint candidacy of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger raises serious questions.
Since military-led governments assumed power in each country following coups d’état, restoring security and regaining control over insurgent-affected territories has been their central pledge. Yet, years later, the reality remains stark. Violent attacks continue to target civilians, security forces, and critical infrastructure across all three nations, with numerous areas still grappling with severe insecurity.
In light of this persistent instability, some analysts argue that announcing a bid for a major continental tournament seems misaligned with current national priorities. Before welcoming thousands of international tourists and foreign delegations, should these governments not first demonstrate that their own citizens can move and live safely throughout the territory?
Logistical hurdles and financial strain
The demands of hosting the AFCON extend far beyond security. The event requires robust road and airport infrastructure, a substantial hotel capacity, advanced medical facilities, and a credible security framework. Meeting these requirements entails a substantial financial outlay—one that comes at a time when all three countries are allocating significant resources to counterinsurgency efforts.
International credibility at stake
For international bodies, sponsors, broadcasters, and commercial partners, stability is non-negotiable. Any ongoing violence or uncertainty could significantly undermine the viability of a candidacy bid. The perception of risk—whether real or perceived—could deter potential stakeholders from endorsing the proposal.
A test of governance and national priorities
This initiative has reignited public debate over governance and national priorities. For many citizens, the most urgent expectation from military authorities remains the restoration of daily security. The promises that accompanied the overthrow of democratically elected leaders were largely predicated on the idea that new leadership would be more effective in combating armed groups. Yet, the persistence of insecurity in several regions has fueled doubts about the true impact of this political transition.
In this context, critics contend that before pursuing the AFCON 2032 bid, Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger must first deliver tangible progress in security, governance, and stability. Organizing an event of this magnitude requires ironclad assurances not only for participants but also for the local population.
A bid for the AFCON can serve as a unifying national project and a catalyst for development. However, its credibility will hinge not on political rhetoric but on the tangible ability of these states to restore lasting security, strengthen institutions, and foster an environment of trust. As long as these core challenges persist, many will continue to argue that the priority remains securing the safety of citizens—not hosting a continental sporting spectacle.